“HOW TO VOTE We have received feedback that the technical wording can be confusing. To be clear: Voting "FOR" = Voting "YES" A "FOR" vote supports the board’s recommendation to unlock investment while keeping fans in the driving seat.”

And Jennings got the assist.

..assisted by Jennings

Foyo scores for Sutton 👀😲

And a further shameful email from the DTB with a thinly veiled attempt to pretend that they’re not recommending a Yes vote on 50+1

More censorship on here.

Shhhhhhhhh Spit - Doobs will be arranging it as a fund raising activity ;)

I've now got a vision of throwing rotten fruit at a few wupsters in stocks:-)

I think that the winding up comes from both sides - to some extent it would be fine to have a reasoned discussion about politics on here but in practice it is impossible to have such a discussion without it descending into pointless name-calling and abuse (again, from both sides), so the logical / sensible conclusion is to simply avoid that topic (I would include religion as well but generally these days most people don't care enough about religion to get very worked up in discussions about it - it would be very different if this guest book had been running in the 16th century)

Is it winding up OI, just a different view that only 3 of us on here agree,the rest have been banned, might as well call this the lefties wup

I've just seen the attendance in the England Women's World Cup qualifying match against Ukraine was 275.

Jennings & Foyo start for Sutton Utd

I see we could drop a couple of places this evening… However, Sunday and Wednesday are surely chances for us to pick up a few points…. 🤞

I was always told if you want to start an argument start talking about politics or religion

I feel like the DTB Chair continues to act in bad faith so I wouldn’t expect any contact from the board regarding the “independent” review and would refuse to sign any NDA if offered. I’m not playing games with the board I want integrity, credibility and accountability and nothing less.

I wonder how many Sutton fans have gone to Hartlepool tonight.

RK - [Link]

Pete, we can always whip out another invitation to meet the Royal Family. This time, restrict it to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

I'd have assumed that you at least would get a copy of the review Trigger, even if you had to sign an NDA first. Maverick clearly deserves a copy too. But then every member does as every member was potentially affected.

You finished?

It is the winding up people to start arguments that is an issue (aka trolling). It tends to happen more with politics than other subjects, which is why politics is mostly best avoided.

Pete - you might be referring to me when you say about politics upsetting people on here? In truth, if you were to chat about Carney/Trump, that sort of thing is good with me - when people explain political stuff objectively and sensibly, I think that’s fine, but it’s when people just post something abusive, purely derogatory, or blatantly untrue, that’s when I find it frustrating… As some have said, I (and others) can always scroll on by, and often do - honestly, feel free to post as you see fit, it’ll be refreshing to hear some informative political stuff, and who knows, it may be the start of a positive movement 🤞☺️

The original set up of the “independent review” was such that the DTB (he who shall not be named) can share all or none of the report with members. Also the (he who shall not be named and George and the ESG) are not obligated to change a damn thing based on the report.

Cant be long until Mayo’s DTB election findings are released to members. I wonder how much will be redacted though.

Trigger - UK is out of favour with Trump because we have sided with Carney over various issues Canada has with USA. I'd explain, but seeing as politics upset certain folk on here, I won't. Let's just say Carney's playing a blinder so far.