No we didn’t go over old ground I think he was just one of those who thought AFCW wouldn’t work and we’d still be playing in muddy fields or have gone bust by now

 CW, did he explain his rationale for following the Franchise?

 I got a ticket in the ballot for Centre Court, Wimbledon yesterday, fantastic I thought, then I got there and who was sitting in front of me but Franchise fan Keith Rance.....what are the odds on that?

 If the voiciferous minority are dictating which possible sponsorship partners are acceptable then why not have a ballot of all DT members that will give authority to the board to contract with the highest bidder. Sick of all this PC garbage

 When are we signing Ollie Palmer?

 Re Germany, in 1990 I saw Kaiserslautern win the German cup beating Werder Bremen 3-2 in the Olympic Stadium, Berlin with 75,000 there. And who did they beat in the semi final???

 The COKE-Cola Company of Los Angeles stadium?

 I would prefer sugar free, caffeine free, fairtrade, zero plastic and harmful E numbers Coca Cola stadium,

 The (Sugar-Free) Coca Cola Stadium has a special ring to it.

 thanks to the gimps love the tag

 We seem incapable of accepting that betting/alcohol/travel (the carbon footprint we just ignore) companies are targeting their market being involved in football. A vocal minority may want to block this and seek a sponsor that is ethically clean by their standards but that sponsor will generate less than the fans sponsoring the crappers at NPL.

 OI, MAD and REPD exactly. Hence my comments about alcohol before. We team up with a brewery but apparently that’s ok cos alcohol does no damage apparently. Like the judge Rinder comment you can’t be a little bit pregnant, if we do any deals with any of these things we’ve already sold our souls and need to just get on with it.

 Nice tag Spit. MAD get a tag.

 Morning all. Maybe those adamantly opposed to the club accepting betting companies to sponsor NPL will put extra money in instead...

 It seems odd that we'd accept betting companies at some levels but not at others. Once you accept betting companies at all, the train has left the station. Maybe needs revisiting with the membership.

 Yea gods. Just about every football fan has a vice. Beer/women/men/wine/dope/betting/travelling etc There is a downside/addiction/carbon footprint to everything. But we have to be sponsor morality police despite when it suits us being less than ‘holy’ but justifying it to ourselves. Ffs, get the betting firm on board.

 So if we remove betting companies and presumably alcohol as well (otherwise hypocrites) what does that leave that would pay enough money to have their name on a football stadium to make it worthwhile for us?

 Does anyone know if we have an allocated end for the offenbach game? accoring to this they are only opening 2 stands. [Link]

 Dondog: Trust members said no to stadium sponsorship from a few types of companies including betting firms but were ambiguous about other, lesser profile types of sponsorship from them until we checked further earlier this year, when it was clearer in favour of accepting lesser types.

 how much can we expect from naming rights? Millions would be great but we are a league 1 team

 MAD - sponsoring a urinal is a new low from our ideas team.

 Did we decide not to accept a betting sponsor? I remember a vote but can’t remember anything since

 We're still pursuing a stadium naming rights partner. There is a line of thinking that sacrificing the naming rights for the occasional match actually increases the value due to the associated publicity.

 Hash, lets hope we’ve not come up with this ‘scheme’ to thwart a sponsor that had a few million on the table but the offended fringe of the club didn’t want it because it’s not an eco/amnesty approved company.....

 WTID-it barely mentions the move to Birmingham, too controversial I suppose