You are on page 37. Click the red cross to clear.
Presumable Southampton fans with non-refundable train or National Express Coach tickets or non-refundable London hotel bookings will need to sue Southampton in the Small Claims Court.
21st May 2026 12:07:29
[82.lo.gg.ed]
May be an opportunity for an enterprising So'ton fan who is also a lawyer to launch a class action!
A4e - maybe because British people have been leaving the UK at a faster rate since July 2024?
21st May 2026 12:02:15
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Wow, net migration is down from 944,000 in 2023 to 171,000 in 2025 - that’s quite some drop!!
21st May 2026 10:22:34
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I think, with a good push, that we'd have been in with a shout of the play-offs in 2002/03. Would be better all round if they put us in instead of 'Boro' on Saturday
21st May 2026 10:21:02
[5.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Trigg - also, most Southampton fans probably don’t think they’d have lasted more than one season in the Prem 😬
21st May 2026 10:20:38
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
OI - yes, I get that idea, and your point has merit for sure, but as someone said yesterday, there’s so much money spent by fans on playoff final day at Wembley, it was never going to get cancelled… 💰
21st May 2026 10:19:13
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Credit to Southampton fans - from the ones I’ve spoken with directly and from most of the stuff I’ve seen from them in the media they are upset and angry with the people at their club who’ve cost them dearly. They’re not blaming the EFL.
21st May 2026 10:13:38
[195.lo.gg.ed]
One line caught from a BBC Solent journo caught my eye and raised a wry smile… “You cannot change a culture with the people who crashed that culture still in place.” Wise words. Maybe they can do an independent review which changes absolutely nothing and brings zero accountability like the Dons Trust did.
Awarding Boro a 3-0 win after the first leg would have been neat but a final endorsement of the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland "Sentence first - verdict afterwards".
21st May 2026 09:54:57
[81.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Timmy, too early in the morning!
21st May 2026 09:49:42
[31.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
a4e - I said I didn't want a team that had lost (to a better team) or a team that cheated to be promoted, which was why my preferred solution, though never going to happen, was scrap the match and promote Hull. Failing that I really hope Hull win it.
21st May 2026 09:46:51
[81.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
That’s victim blaming. There’s a rule in place to protect them already, why should they have to protect themselves against the rules being broken?
21st May 2026 09:46:10
[89.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I have a solution to the playoff and WC issues and missing teams. Let Iran play Hull on Saturday and let Soton play in their place in the WC ...
21st May 2026 09:43:00
[31.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
TM, stealing is stealing, I can't condone that. However when it's clear others want what you have, Theres a duty on oneself to employ some form of protection if you don't want to give it away. These clubs are vying for the £100,000,000 prize, I'll say it again, the £100,000,000 prize, not spending some cash on screening the training pitch is on the club. If that is interfered with, then there's a trespassing or damaging issue which then becomes a criminal matter. That then becomes a whole different situation that has, in my view, legal ramifications attached to it, not moral ones, about someone's hurty actions in being a voyeur. Just draw the curtains.
21st May 2026 08:40:43
[146.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
It's also on you to sort out your (theoretical) behaviour Timmy
21st May 2026 08:26:15
[217.lo.gg.ed]
personal responsibility - don't always blame others!
Spot on about Gibson, he’s been a great owner. Funny that the enshriners never mention people like him…
21st May 2026 08:21:56
[217.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
“ The onus surely should be on the club, and that's all clubs to protect their own "crown jewels "
So if I shoplift it’s on Waitrose for not employing security?
21st May 2026 08:19:00
[217.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
EFL fixtures out 12pm Thurs 25th June
21st May 2026 08:13:39
[217.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I'm of the view that the EFL should have dealt with the matter after the first leg and awarded Middlesboro a 3-0 win. After all, the transgression was before the first leg and 'Boro would have been able to adjust to suit as they would for a replay.
21st May 2026 08:11:47
[5.lo.gg.ed]
Did think during the 2nd leg with all the Saints fans dressed as tress/bushes and with binoculars was a massive slight to the Football Gods.
I'm still in the Southampton have been hard done by camp. I find it bizarre that people such as borough fans could be looking in on the training sessions and nothing would have or has been said. The onus surely should be on the club, and that's all clubs to protect their own "crown jewels " tactics they intend to employ, by ensuring it's done behind closed door. Why not inside the stadium itself? Or inside, as Trigger has said in an indoors facility. I know I'm in a minority, but have to say that if you are careless with your wares, don't be be surprised to get mugged.
21st May 2026 08:03:08
[146.lo.gg.ed]
I really wanted Boro to get to the Premier league, as a chairman Gibson has been a brilliant owner and has shown that there decent ones out there. If I were to follow a south coast club, Southampton wouldn't be it, but I think on the two matches played, they were the better side. He says covering his mouth hoping nobody sees that...
Yeah you hear a drone you move the training session inside. These clubs have massive indoor facilities.
20th May 2026 23:26:57
[195.lo.gg.ed]
And drones make a god-awful sound that permeates all other noise.There’s a reason that football clubs reporting drone interference isn’t a regular thing. It’s a real shame what Southampton have done - but I do say that with the acceptance that maybe they were only the second bunch to be caught whilst many are doing it.
Training sessions are pretty noisy too, not sure that a drone would be spotted/heard very quickly and even then, would you be able to stop a session indefinitely? Is it illegal to fly one (I know there are regulations) and how could you know it isn’t a casual person piloting the thing and filming the landscape, as I’m sure you couldn’t prove who the user is, and guess the user wouldn’t necessarily be the recipient of the information.
20th May 2026 23:20:38
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Yeah. It drones go FFFFFFZZZZZZZZZZ and everyone looks up at them.
20th May 2026 23:06:30
[195.lo.gg.ed]
The technology to disable them remotely is still not legally approved in the UK but the cameras available to be affixed are not sufficiently capable to record detail at a distance from which the FFFFFFZZZZZZZZ isn’t audible.
