Couple of interesting tidbits outside the main headlines yesterday: SSC incorporated in June only to provide the 2 mil loan facility that ultimately wasn’t needed. And any increased sponsorship they might gain will offset their cash injection for the season but player sales will not. For that, 85% goes back to playing budget and 15% goes to club / infrastructure.

Marcus Forss now plays for FC Neftchi Fergana.

Bromley had some big defeats,which normally means a manager gets sacked

Jackson to Bromley and we get John Terry, not a bad swap

That sucks for Woodman as he's done a brilliant job for them and now he pays the price for it.

Woodman sacked by Bromley. Job for Johnnie?

I think the Wrexham photo is hinting at why Wrexham will win because the people who decide will want to meet Ryan Gosling or whoever it is.

Phil Vickery looks like a bag of varnished walnuts now…. [Link]

Trigg - ditto the Wrexham photo…

Are there any clauses that state the investors could/cannot adjust their numbers if we were to get relegated…?

Lol the author is trolling MK with the picture they’ve selected.

CW - that’s disgusting 🤮

[Link]

Ah ok, thanks CW, I must have missed that bit. John Terry in then.

Nice!

The 2 million mentioned could be used in January which might be enough to keep us in league one

“The dons have lots of money but we’ll still lose the league”

Hopefully the 4-6months when the money would run out and debts spiral will persuade the doubters to vote yes. I'm sure most thought we would be lucky to get a10 million investor. Short term this secures the club and Hopefully progresses to the best league in the championship with a higher capacity.

Thanks Dazzer

From what I understood this probably will not change anythib this season. The EFL and FRC have to carry out thier due diligence checks and that’s all in thier own time iirc. The hope is to be able to submit a decent budget in April for next season.

Hash get that but take back control of what? A club with staff on contacts we can’t afford? And I more mean what happens after 5 yrs if they want out (for any reason)

Spit. No we won't as they'll get injured in their first training session

The Trust has veto on any future shareholders should SSC decide they want to sell

Aideen if they stop the funding we take back control in 3 months and we get a veto on who buys their shares is my understanding

It’s basically making us the same as everyone else Aideen - if owners want to sell up then we find new owners. They’ll want their ROI so unless they’ve extracted that during the five years then they’ll only sell if there’s a willing buyer.