Would a company be expected to interview someone for a job who in the past had made derogatory remarks about it's management and customers?

The money Hammam spent on Fashanu (£125k) was a calculated risk given how close we were with a matter of games left to reaching the first division. He more than recouped whatever he put in. Hammam was no idiot. He identified the antics of Wally and co, saw the unity it brought and used that. He didn’t create that spirit but saw it's value. It would have happened with or without him. If Hammam ever gets back in charge he would be looking at how he could make money and happily trample on our history again. He tried it with Cardiff but they were having none of it.

UK system - allow almost any UK citizen over 18 to stand for election. Russian system - allows anyone approved by Putin to stand for election.

Bert - despite all the noise surrounding Hammam since our earlier exchange of messages, my question of 09.45 still stands.

DO - I think it is gradually being realised you just can't behave like that. By the way it isn't even like the current government doing it, it is like someone who stuck their hand up when the government asked for volunteers for a different purpose, doing it.

Quelle surprise. Chris Wilder looks to be heading back to Sheffield Utd.

The money sam spent on Fashanu to push us over the line and make us a regular top league club was amazing 👏 history is history, sam helped promote that crazy gang spirit which everyone apart from wimbledon fans hated.

Can you imagine if the current Government, with their healthy majority, introduced a new rule that anyone standing for parliament had to never have criticised any of the current government?

I have no time for SH, however I also can’t be arsed to keep hating the past and anything or anyone connected with that. We can all live in the past sometimes and forget what is needed in the future.

I really don't understand why WIJG follows AFCW. He demonstrates, time and again, he has no affinity to Wimbledon as a location or the area it represents and why it was created to start with. Maybe he just likes the Wimbledon name. He constantly contradicts himself. He likes to brag how rich he would have us believe he is but constantly finds excuses not to put his hand in his pocket, citing his desire for anonymity or not wanting to fund other people's hobby if they don't pay the same, yet claims he would happily price long term supporters out of attending to fund his desire. Now he talks about Hammam as some sort of hero, stating how much money Hammam put in to achieve the success WFC did and how he would oay for his ticket as a guest. If true, is it OK for somebody else to fund the success of a football team for others to enjoy as long as it's not him? It's called hypocrisy. Hammam was an opportunistic leech in it for his own ego and self-aggrandisement. WIJG demonstrates similar traits and loves the attention his alter ego on here gets.

JG is Sam Hammam, I’ll have my £10 please

Galty-this is a new low even for you, can’t believe you fell for his patter

Silk - the game is on ITV 1, the crowd before and afterwards is on ITV 4 under their boxing coverage

If you want some free football on TV today ITV1 has got Southampton v Portsmouth on from 11:30 today - kick off is 12 noon.

Your occasional reminder that there are those with money, and those who have you believe they have money

BTW Galty we owe more to Ron Noades than Hammam. Ever heard of his name?

He's not posted for weeks and now WIJG surfaces to defend the person that single handedly destroyed over a 100 years of history. Hammam was a conman. He is hardly going to say he hated Wimbledon or was in it for himself. You've posted some absolute crap since you appeared WIJG but this has taken your self-interest and total lack of understanding to a new depth. Hammam was on an ego trip and couldn't give a shit about what Wimbledon was but what it could be used to become, something you seem to relate to, hence why you became a franchise supporter. I'm sure you're doing it to get a reaction so I'm not going to give you the satisfaction.

John Galt proves he was taken in by a snake oil salesman

There are certain similarities between Who is John Galt and Sham in truth, so perhaps no surprise he felt a kindred spirit.

And as if by magic, nice to have your scribes Rob.

A-IoW,, good point. I'm making myself annoyed and letting the memory of that toe rag (who I had no idea was still alive or dead and didn't care either way) ruin a good outcome on the pitch yesterday.

Who is John Galt - yes Sham definitely had our best interests at heart when we sold our home. Deluded.

WRT Hammam, I have heard interesting comments about him from somebody pretty high up at Cardiff...

I can’t help but respond to the vitriolic diatribe regarding Sam Hamman. If he was literally prevented from attending the game yesterday then it is a disgrace and one which needs to be rectified. I spent a train journey in the early 90s with him - coming back from an away match in Newcastle. He was positive, passionate and loved Wimbledon. He absolutely epitomised the Wimbledon spirit – the underdog fighting against all of the odds and without much financial muscle - seeing us promoted and prosper in the Premier League. To suggest that any of that would have happened without him is ridiculous. As far as I am concerned, he is more than welcome to be my guest at any home match and I will willingly fund his ticket as a gesture of appreciation for all the fond memories and everything he brought to this Club.

Morning all. SW19 on us beating Rotherham now up - [Link]