
On the whole "sacrosanct" thing, the only goals that are arguably sacrosanct are the Dons Trust's Objects, as set out in Rule 2 of the Constitution. And they're only sacrosanct until members vote to change them. There's nothing in the Objects requiring majority ownership of the Club. Some of them are arguably better served via maintaining majority ownership. But others would not be, I would argue. In particular, "strengthening the bonds between the Club and the community which it serves" (the very first Object) is arguably served by on-the-field success and expanding the stadium, neither of which is easily reconciled with fan ownership.