You are on page 12. Click the red cross to clear.
“The below is based on my understanding of the review based on the announcement from the Dons Trust Board themselves:
1. As independent reviewer you report into the Dons Trust Board - this creates a potential conflict of interest. I believe you
should report to the membership as a whole and not the board.
2. Your completed report will be shared with the Dons Trust Board and they will decide whether and how much to share with
members - would you consider committing to sharing your completed report with those who have engaged with the review
instead of just the board?
3. The Dons Trust board will make any and all decisions on what happens post-review - you could do wholly excellent work
and make reasonable and effective recommendations for changes to prevent repeated reviews being necessary and the
board could ignore it completely. I'm afraid I see no solution to this in the current structure and this is the main point for me
thinking that I'm better off pursuing alternative routes to resolving things.“
16th Apr 2026 22:14:02
[178.lo.gg.ed]
This was my position from the very start of my communication with Ed Mayo MBE. The fact that he has made some
significant factual errors in the final report is of no surprise. This football club cannot regulate itself. It has proved this many
times over and only those remaining few fanatical clique members on Discord sing along. Everyone else wants a functioning
football club like we used to have.
This is Wimbledon FC/AFC Wimbledon and it will outlive these people.
16th Apr 2026 22:04:11
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
No value in arguing with the clique they’ve brought this club to its knees with their culture. Discord is just five people agreeing with each other. Yes I’m still banned from there but the last time I challenged it Reece Wally Shitforbrains suggested he wrote my apology for me.
16th Apr 2026 22:00:33
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Couldn’t make it up. These people will be gone and probably banned as soon as real people run the club. Let’s hope we don’t experience administration points deductions between now and then.
Poor Kent team VCD athletic have folded were in same division as the bulls but got relegated
16th Apr 2026 21:05:43
[146.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Keefy - yes, I think Plymouth will beat us easily on Saturday, they’ll be so up for it, and their game against Exeter was a bit of a wobble… It’s gonna be tough - I expect Curtis and Tolaj to both score….
16th Apr 2026 21:03:46
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
OI I’d suggest the fact he’s not in there is exactly why they’re doing it. There’s some shoddy cowardice about some behaviours over the past few years.
16th Apr 2026 20:52:06
[185.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Has anyone announced the current level of ST renewal - I’m thinking it might be down vs last season due to cost of living, etc…?
16th Apr 2026 19:50:47
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Bromley could go up tonight
16th Apr 2026 19:50:27
[146.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Some critics have attacked Shane’s decision to decline an interview, claiming his refusal proves the "process" was justified. However, the facts don't support this. Given the history of these matters, it is reasonable to ask why he would participate in an "independent" review when his interest in the role has long since faded. Furthermore, considering the nature of past complaints and previous outcomes, it’s easy to view this as another toothless, "tick-box" exercise.
16th Apr 2026 19:30:07
[51.lo.gg.ed]
Thankfully its pretty decent, shame it wasn't done years ago.
Same here. Not on Discord, but as OI says Shane is unable to respond as he isn't either.
16th Apr 2026 18:21:56
[146.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
No idea what was said on Discord. My point was that Shane has no right of reply. Anyone associated with the election is free to comment here if they wish (at least I believe so). In fact it would be great if some did.
16th Apr 2026 18:07:20
[86.lo.gg.ed]
To avoid hypocrisy though it would be good not to attack people who are banned from here!
Just had a quick look on Discord to see what all the fuss is about. Can't find what you might call personal attacks. Nothing as bad as describing everyone involved in The Dons Trust election as not a single decent human being among them.
16th Apr 2026 18:02:32
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Padds - To some that doesn't stop him being attacked on Discord, which is a pity.
16th Apr 2026 17:02:19
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I didn't think our Trig was allowed on Discord.
16th Apr 2026 16:56:11
[146.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
The police were there because they knew about the gathering. Sending out descriptions would enable vigilante dickheads to attack innocent people on the basis of e g. ethnicity. Let them do their job and find the perpetrators, which they will.
16th Apr 2026 16:17:54
[148.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
You don't normally see as many "tooled up" police when you have a certain demographic wandering the streets armed to the teeth with machetes. It was well OTT for a few hundred angry, and concerned people, who weren't tooled up.
16th Apr 2026 16:08:25
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Dave skinners having a laugh, Epsom has a,B&M which makes it a slum :-(
16th Apr 2026 15:53:33
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
A lot of the crowd in Epsom last night were treated for shock after going in to GAILS and PRET A MANGER by mistake :)
16th Apr 2026 15:31:09
[5.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I had family visiting Epsom hospital during last night's protest. No prob for them though. I thought the police presence was completely OTT for what was mostly a peaceful gathering of concerned folk. One or two oiks throwing stuff, but nothing to warrant that level of enforcement.
16th Apr 2026 15:17:56
[45.lo.gg.ed]
as someone asked, where were those plod during the Clapham thing?
