Today Tomorrow Mon 23 Tue 24 Wed 25 Thu 26 Fri 27







9 Years Podcast
Enter e-mail and Tag To Login
Paper's Crowd Count
Last 5 minutes : 11
Last 24 hours : 4391
Refresh Clear Form
   
You are on page 4. Click the red cross to clear.
The Met Police had the good sense to recognise that the Downing Street gatherings I attended were work events for me, but parties for everyone else. So all my staff can go fuck themselves.
20th May 2022 15:37:11 
[77.lo.gg.ed] 
Boris Johnson
biggles
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I have known Ian E since we were tiny tiny children - his ability to create swear words is quite remarkable :)
20th May 2022 15:31:12 
[10.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
More from JJ - [Link]
20th May 2022 15:28:08 
[143.lo.gg.ed] 
Interesting comments about the budget
Ian E, enjoyed use of the term 'asshats', keep up the good work.
20th May 2022 15:14:22 
[87.lo.gg.ed] 
kt2
It's technically not a word so couldn't possibly contravene any guidelines.
actually all offenders - no need to regular
20th May 2022 14:46:52 
[10.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Your name ist on our list, Herr Ian E
20th May 2022 14:38:48 
[143.lo.gg.ed] 
AFCW SoMe Stasi
repd
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Not interested in any of this social media rubbish. Make some player announcements you asshats
20th May 2022 14:37:17 
[77.lo.gg.ed] 
Is that the sort of thing that will get me in trouble now..?
or what Dazzer said 9 seconds earlier
20th May 2022 14:31:35 
[212.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
It all seems like a storm in a teacup. There isn't anything I find offensive in the guidelines (though some might be upset by the implication there are only two genders) and they do have a duty of care to employees etc. Not the most vital issue but I doubt it toll up a lot of Jacson or Buckley's time.
20th May 2022 14:30:12 
[212.lo.gg.ed] 
it doesn't apply here anyway
It's a "no one tells me what to do" storm in a tea cup - the swearing reference is a bit rubbish - but the rest of it is fair enough & all clubs should be calling out people that are regular abuse offenders on their official social media sites
20th May 2022 14:30:03 
[10.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
has the club called for a boycott of the world cup over Qatar's attitudes? Til then kiss my arse with the hypocrisy
20th May 2022 14:23:00 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Just seen the club statement. The mind boggles at the arrogance of it all.
20th May 2022 14:19:35 
[77.lo.gg.ed] 
nug
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
There is a danger that people who get worked up about snowflakes are actually becoming snowflakes themselves here.
20th May 2022 14:05:46 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Nick - there are at least one or two who I would prefer to concentrate on 1 and 2 rather than getting them involved in 3.
20th May 2022 13:50:22 
[212.lo.gg.ed] 
is that acceptable comment please?
Wonder if the same person is involved in this story [Link] and the social media one on our OS.
20th May 2022 13:35:35 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
3. Sort out he governance of world football.
You do think that someone in the DT must have a "to do" list along the lines of 1. Sort out the governance of English football 2. Clean up the internet 3. Sort out AFCW football team (only if time...)
20th May 2022 13:28:09 
[109.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I think if you mention the name of the black labrador owned by Guy Gibson of The Dambusters squadron you may well be banned.
20th May 2022 13:22:31 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
Advice for dave skinner.
And if, quite hypothetically, I were to do such a thing, I would not be including the excellent Doobs.
20th May 2022 13:20:44 
[2.lo.gg.ed] 
Obviously
Paddington - they'd be very stupid to do so. But if they did, you could just use "fair opinion" as a response
20th May 2022 13:20:32 
[143.lo.gg.ed] 
Again, I'm waiting for the first person to fall foul of this new diktat.
That’s the official podcast screwed then. Bet a few of them are scrambling to delete their anonymous accounts
20th May 2022 13:18:14 
[10.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
So if, for example, I called the authors of this policy 'fascist bastards' on this guestbook would I be subject to their sanctions?
20th May 2022 13:17:17 
[2.lo.gg.ed] 
Not that I would dream of doing so, obviously.
Are the Dons trust board actually running the club for all fans or just their own agenda, as certainly getting up a lot of fans noses from what I'm reading.
20th May 2022 13:16:43 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
Will be selling the guardian in the club shop next:-)
Nick Woking - "I can certainly imagine the club last season taking the view that anyone criticising Robinson or any of the players would have been banned because they were "abusive or insulting". If that happened, and I don't think even AFCW would be dumb enough to try it, it wouldn't stay in-house for very long...
20th May 2022 12:55:55 
[143.lo.gg.ed] 
If it's just for official channels, then yes - all it will do is just make them even more bland than normal.
I can certainly imagine the club last season taking the view that anyone criticising Robinson or any of the players would have been banned because they were "abusive or insulting". To be honest you never really expect to get a sensible discussion on official media channels (as basically they are just for the club to broadcast its official messages to a passive audience) and so long as they don't try to expand the remit of these rules (and I can see them being used against posters who challnge the "party line" on the DT Pro Boards pretty soon) it doesn't really matter, I suppose.
20th May 2022 12:51:54 
[109.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
So if you say anything about gay black disabled labradors wearing saris you will be banned ?
20th May 2022 12:47:20 
[87.lo.gg.ed] 
dave skinner
Just asking for a friend