The Met Police had the good sense to recognise that the Downing Street gatherings I attended were work events for me, but parties for everyone else. So all my staff can go fuck themselves.

I have known Ian E since we were tiny tiny children - his ability to create swear words is quite remarkable :)

More from JJ - [Link]

Ian E, enjoyed use of the term 'asshats', keep up the good work.

actually all offenders - no need to regular

Your name ist on our list, Herr Ian E

Not interested in any of this social media rubbish. Make some player announcements you asshats

or what Dazzer said 9 seconds earlier

It all seems like a storm in a teacup. There isn't anything I find offensive in the guidelines (though some might be upset by the implication there are only two genders) and they do have a duty of care to employees etc. Not the most vital issue but I doubt it toll up a lot of Jacson or Buckley's time.

It's a "no one tells me what to do" storm in a tea cup - the swearing reference is a bit rubbish - but the rest of it is fair enough & all clubs should be calling out people that are regular abuse offenders on their official social media sites

has the club called for a boycott of the world cup over Qatar's attitudes? Til then kiss my arse with the hypocrisy

Just seen the club statement. The mind boggles at the arrogance of it all.

There is a danger that people who get worked up about snowflakes are actually becoming snowflakes themselves here.

Nick - there are at least one or two who I would prefer to concentrate on 1 and 2 rather than getting them involved in 3.

Wonder if the same person is involved in this story [Link] and the social media one on our OS.

You do think that someone in the DT must have a "to do" list along the lines of 1. Sort out the governance of English football 2. Clean up the internet 3. Sort out AFCW football team (only if time...)

I think if you mention the name of the black labrador owned by Guy Gibson of The Dambusters squadron you may well be banned.

And if, quite hypothetically, I were to do such a thing, I would not be including the excellent Doobs.

Paddington - they'd be very stupid to do so. But if they did, you could just use "fair opinion" as a response

That’s the official podcast screwed then. Bet a few of them are scrambling to delete their anonymous accounts

So if, for example, I called the authors of this policy 'fascist bastards' on this guestbook would I be subject to their sanctions?

Are the Dons trust board actually running the club for all fans or just their own agenda, as certainly getting up a lot of fans noses from what I'm reading.

Nick Woking - "I can certainly imagine the club last season taking the view that anyone criticising Robinson or any of the players would have been banned because they were "abusive or insulting". If that happened, and I don't think even AFCW would be dumb enough to try it, it wouldn't stay in-house for very long...

I can certainly imagine the club last season taking the view that anyone criticising Robinson or any of the players would have been banned because they were "abusive or insulting". To be honest you never really expect to get a sensible discussion on official media channels (as basically they are just for the club to broadcast its official messages to a passive audience) and so long as they don't try to expand the remit of these rules (and I can see them being used against posters who challnge the "party line" on the DT Pro Boards pretty soon) it doesn't really matter, I suppose.

So if you say anything about gay black disabled labradors wearing saris you will be banned ?