CW - To be honest Ranulph Fiennes set such a high bar on that kind of stuff that it weirdly doesn't seem as bad. [Link]

OI I'd say most people on the internet are not capable of holding 2 things like that when only one of the things matches their beliefs and the other doesn't. Everything is Boolean these days. You're either with us 100% on every syllable of every word or you're a fascist, boomer, woke etc.

[Link]

Most people seem to be able to hold two ideas in their head, for example that the attack by Hamas last October was horrific but so is the loss of life by innocent civilians in Gaza. Or maybe that both kicking a man in the head and then stamping on him and stabbing someone in broad daylight are wrong.

West Indies win the toss and bat in the 3rd Test

Inner London was desperately needed and anywhere with high volume of tall, grouped together buildings does need pollution control. It would be mad not to. Areas with wide open spaces and less congestion less so.

Amazing how the left love schemes that cost and effect poor working class people . They worry more about police brutality than a soldier being stabbed 70 times in front of his wife. Seems the left are always on side of criminals

The Standard story mentions TFL's big expansion of electric buses, people buying electric cars regardless of ULEZ, the increase of cycling, and the phase-out of diesel taxis. All will have improved air quality.

Probably took readings in the countryside in biggin hill😂

Lurker- they have no way of attributing what caused the figures.

Not sure that report proves anything about ULEZ expansion. By its own admission, it's impossible to "isolate the impact of the ULEZ and its expansion".

Lol, usual doctored results. Apparently he want to serve 6 terms ,so 16 more years of ruining London!

So it's better than fuck all is what they're saying. (As in the levels were 2.7% expected and 4.4% actual - which is what the article says).

OI wasn't that expected level the one where their own report said something about it was so negligible that everyone in London would need to live to 110 to see even an extra day of life from it?

They will just say that's fake news OI.

In NFL, teams used to play 16 matches. They now play 17, so supporters still get 8 regular season home games.

[Link]

Yeah butt out of our metropolis Padds!

I didn't know I hated him until I saw him at Plough Lane. Heartsinking.

This quote from Khan sums it up nicely "“Liverpool, the club I support as Mayor of London, are currently on tour in America,”"

The EPL big 6 fans made it clear they're not having it taken away from English football, I can't see the other sides agreeing. (Let's be honest it will be the sides with the big selling names playing there so will just keep the likes of Man Cheaty rolling in it). Worth remembering our chances of big money come from EPL clubs spending cash on our current or former players. We really need them to stay around.

so when it's rich people's play things he's in favour of pollution (they're not travelling by fucking boat are they) just the peasants who need to shut up and stop doing anything.

The major difference between the NFL and the EPL is that the NFL understands that the best way to do business is to ensure parity as much as possible. Having the owner with the most money does not guarantee endless success like with Man City. The two dominant teams have come from the best generational QB - Brady and Mahomes - but even they do not win by default. Teams like Detroit can be terrible for years but can then make the playoffs and even win the title if they get the right Head Coach.

NFL "fans" are pretty apathetic. Years of being beaten down, has them brainwashed accepting that sport is a business. Mostly they watch the game in bars, and pay little attention to the game.

Khan may be a slippery wee wanker-cunt but the English Premier League is mahooooosive. Do NFL fans bemoan the games played in London? Or ditto the Major League Baseball fans?