Callum Kennedy for me

Tough one - i know he is possibly past it now, but Reeves?

Agreed Hash - Wycombe’s indifference is our gain. Who’s the best returning player (AFCW to AFCW I’m not talking your Gayles or Sullivans)? Tilley? Seddon? Kennedy?

Bizarre that Duff doesn't think Tilley is good enough or maybe just doesn't fit in whatever random system he uses.

Some early “new” signing news [Link]

Did we loan any players out to a club in the EFL or did we only consider clubs in the Conference National/Conference South

Reading between the lines, all kits at sale price in the latest email suggests anther 3 coming out AGAIN this summers.

…two play off spots to be fought out on the final day between Bradford, Stevenage, Luton and Plymouth.

Peterborough can claim safety this evening with a win or a draw at home to Mansfield. Mansfield have nothing to play for but they had nothing to play for on Saturday when they tonked Huddersfield 1-4 away, so it won’t be easy for Posh.

Same women’s team that just avoided relegation?

Don’t forget the ladies are playing in a cup final at Sutton tonight nd would appreciate your support

I think what Laurence is perceiving as some folk being eager for administration is based around the lack of confidence in 50+1 being able to fully solve our problems when it comes to finance. I know for example Stu D (hope he won’t mind me using him as an example) has stated that he’d prefer to go 100% sell right now. That doesn’t appear to be possible within our own rules and is certainly not something that the boards are going to fight for (as it effectively ends their grip on the club.) I don’t think anyone really *wants* administration as there are a lot of negative impacts that come as standard eg points deductions/loyal local suppliers not getting paid etc. But anyone who lacks belief in 50+1 being a success then under current circumstances administration is the only alternative end result.

Tamworth being bought by some yank consortium I see

50%+1 obvs

Totally agree with Keefy that administration (cash flow in our case) is undesirable but I do not see many routes that avoid it. %0%+1 with working capital may be one but I'm not sure there are investors who would pump in money year by year whilst being outvoted by the Trust

Not eager at all Laurence thats why we should seek a buyer while we are solvent. Also as you say it will be interesting as to who we have in the background who is willing to inveast without control.

Keefy - I was off at the Master Investor show last Saturday. Didn't hear a single person or trust mention investing in AFC Wimbledon.

Keefy: Going into administration is a formal insolvency process in the UK that is typically triggered when a company is insolvent—meaning it cannot pay its debts when they are due (cash flow insolvency) or its liabilities exceed its assets (balance sheet insolvency). Why are you and others so eager to embrace administration?

Keefy, I guess the choice is 1) small squad with (say) L1 players backed up by loanees/yoof versus 2) normal squad of L2 players with "risky" additions

OI Obviously thats why we should look out for a buyer. The time things take to happen at Wimbledon we could well be in administration before the trust members get a vote whether we approve any 50+1 investment.

Sasu would be best to loan out for 6 months to get some fitness and regular football

50%+1 money in itself isn't meant for the budget, 'working capital' may be, if such a beast ever actually exists. Even if negotiations move forward quickly, I'd have thought it would be close to the end of the year before there wasa vote to confirm it. Anyone thinking we will get full details of any proposed agreement should look up 'commercial confidentiality'.

As we have unfortunately found out this season with a small squad nearly delvering relegation. I hope we have learnt!

Sandy, 23/24. We lost the previous week and couldn't make the playoffs. We won 5-1 at home to Walsall on the final day.

DO. If we keep squad levels the same then I can't see Sasu being on that big of a wedge to price him out of our thinking or to need to free up a wage.