Absolute mess and completely predictable when you look at board conduct for the last 5 years or more. Nothing done well, nothing got right first time, censorship and silence over communication and transparency. Zero accountability in fact people appear to be protected and even rewarded for failure.

I assume that TM is being sarcastic there - but, whether this is the case or not, the phrase "200 posts on discord" is hardly evidence of communication - the contrary if anything. If nothing else discord is a medium used only by a tiny minority of the supporters (basically those who are DT governance hobbyists) and is certainly not a proper communication tool. Also, anything that needs 200 posts to discuss it is, by definition, being made too complicated.

Donial - over 200 posts on discord discussing the ins and out - recommend heading there

For me. the 50.01% gives us a chance of a debt/bond-equity swap to, more or less, cancel the former and lower our costs by approx £350,000pa. Other reasons as per Nick Woking. So a YES for me

Echo Donial and Nick - it’s a big no/abstain combo from me until someone learns to speak in plain English to us…. 🤷🏻‍♂️🙄

Also doesn't help that the voting email comes from Survey Monkey - rather than from the DT, which certainly doesn't make it look official or important.

The communication is absolutely shocking and really confusing - I have no idea whether the new constitution needs to pass or whether this is just being chucked in a "might as well do that at the same time" basis (hence I abstained on that, as my view is that the details of the constitution are pretty moot anyway, given the short period before we collapse). If changing the ownership limits is so vital then the communication needed to focus only on that and be 100% clear - those of us on here are probably in the most engaged element of the fanbase and are struggling. The chances of someone who got the membership free on a "loyalty card" basis with their season ticket taking the time to try to navigate the complexity involved must be pretty small.

I’m really struggling to make head nor tail of all this DT stuff. Normally reading on here helps but I’m still at a loss. Is anyone able to offer a simple explanation into what exactly we’re being asked to do? Why are there 2 SGMs? Is 50.01 vote linked to others or can I vote for that alone?

Will the DTB reap what they have sown? A failure to reach the required level of support for 50+1 because many of those recipients they handed membership to free of charge will take no notice of anything that is as unintelligible to many as the recent communications are.

I might be condemning the club to oblivion but I really can't vote for 50+1.

To me tge whole 50%+1/ removal of the 15% limit thing is quite unlikely to prevent administration (I simply don’t believe that we will attract a minority investor who will cover our ongoing losses) but it’s definitely a step in the right direction and will likely result in us having a significant investor who will be in prime position to step in and take real control when the money runs out, so I am inclined to vote in favour of that. To me it seems slightly mad to be tying this vote up with all the pointless complexity of a new constitution, but perhaps I am missing something as I haven’t given that aspect any real thought.

That's some goal from Jennings. Great to see.

£400k missing but vote how we recommend

OI - they’ll need more than that, but if they keep winning, they’ll be on a stairway to heaven…. 😂

And meanwhile where is the £400k or any action on trying to rescue the £400k or any learnings for how to stop another £400k disappearing into the same hole?

Hoping for 29 points a4e? [Link]

Robert Plant is enjoying the game at Molineux…

And I understand that too ML. Voting NO, according to the DTB, pretty much condemns us to administration in the short term. Voting YES appears to line the pockets of some select people before administration in the slightly less short term.

Trigger - I get where you are coming from but it’s a “yes” for me all day long. It’s the first step

That sounds plausible OI in terms of it being about member resolutions.

Osman Foyo goal [Link] Kai Jennings goal [Link]

I wonder what odds you could get on Wolves staying up and Spurs going down as a double…? 👀😲

Nice [Link]

I may be wrong but my understanding is that the DTB would only make recommendations on members resolutions if there was a legal or similar compeliing concern. I would have thought by definition they wanted you to vote for any resolution they put forward. Why would they propose something they wanted the membership to oppose?

Pretty good results in our division