DO - I do like that you pull up someone for being presumptuous and literally the next sentence you presume everyone voted Brexit on the basis of leaving the single market and customs union.

 My post incorrect as we have the freehold!

 Site!

 Stephen Alambritis, happened to knock on my door last night canvassing for labour. Had a chat about Plough Lane, saying he was pushing for us to get the freehold of the sight. Thanked him very much for his work but told him while Corbyn was leader i would not vote Labour! I dont think he would either! Think he has written off the the European elections.

 Sidney B - You cannot take those who chose not to vote into account as you do not know how they would have voted - at best you could say they weren't bothered either way. It was made clear in the referendum that if we left the EU we would also leave both the single market and the customs union. A no deal brexit is far closer to this than it is to the half-baked deal that TM has secured.

 I think that if there was another vote now it would swing to remain and the simple reason is when the original voting took place a lot of people were under the impression the U.K was going to go back to the old days where if you came over from another country to live here you had to have a job and somewhere to live before you came and was also told by such a person who came to live here in the sixties that you were checked upon to make sure you were still working and had a place to live by the authorities. People voted out mainly because you had people coming to live here because they would get a free meal in housing and benefits. Made even worse that there were a number of documentaries on television where some such people were coming here just to claim everything even though their family with kids were still in their original country and they were using the benefits they got to build themselves new houses in the country they came from.

 Look, an EU flag - how appropriate ;)

 *but

 DO/Diddy - yes I’m aware the MPs are heavily “remain”, but should t there have been plan for exiting before the referendum JUST IN CASE the country voted to leave? We keep being told that “they voted for this and they voted for that”, it it seems there wasn’t a plan - if there had been, we would have left by now..... Who said doing a deal would be simple and quick, was it David Davis? Not only was he Brexit secretary, he’s also Leaver, so he should’ve sorted it, but he didn’t, so weak. Liam Fox said it too - isn’t he a Leaver....? Doh!

 I voted remain, I'd vote remain again but how would a second referendum be definitive if it had a narrow remain majority, which is probably the most likely outcome? We're getting ten more years of this madness with either an economic crisis or a democratic crisis.

 Dons Outlook - "The majority of the population wish to leave. The vast majority of those want to leave regardless". Really? What evidence apart from the 2016 referendum (in which far less than half the population voted Leave) do you have for that statement?

 DO - The majority of people in this country do not want a No Deal Brexit. Once people get to the point of realising that there is no majority for any outcome, then you have to ask how we reach a majority consensus.

 More accurate to say that, three years ago, 52% of the 72% who voted in the referendum (ie 37%) wanted to leave - not quite the same as "the majority of the population wish to leave" now

 A4e…. Has it crossed your mind that it is MP'S who also wanted to remain who are the ones who are working on trying to deliver Brexit. May didn't vote out did she?

 Think I'll just have a peek at the NPL web cam and see how things are coming along.... Oh! wait...

 Russ - No. The majority of the population wish to leave. The vast majority of those want to leave regardless. Yes, it would be better to have a deal, but if notthn we leave with no deal. Only a tiny number of people want to leave only if there is a deal and would rather stay than leave with no deal.

 DO - So it's a minority view of the population, then. Why would parliament support a minority position for such an important topic? They need to reach a consensus. Really they should be looking at preferred and 2nd choice positions to find the outcome that is most acceptable to most people.

 9 days to the world.cup starts,come on England .best squad ever.

 [Link]

 Newsnow saying we've signed Nesta (yay!) but link doesn't work.

 Nesta Guinness-walker,now thats a great name..

 Russ - the majority want to leave. That question has been asked and answered. There is a difference between wanting to leave with No Deal and accepting that, in the absence of an acceptable deal, it is better to leave with no deal than remain. Over 500 of our 650 MPs voted for Article 50 - how can a majority now vote to revoke it?

 A4e - Wally has his list of 1,000 players. Him making this public is a master stroke. If a player is approached now, he knows he is top of the list so flattered, but also knows that if he pushes for too good a deal, there are 999 other players that WAG can approach and two months to do so.

 DO - So is that 60% of 60% are happy to leave with a No Deal? ie a minority?

 A4e - it is not the 'Leave Side' that have failed to deliver Brexit. A remainer PM with a split party and a split opposition plus 100 die-hard remainer smaller party MPs that have failed. The 'Leave Side' as you call them have never had a chance to negotiate with the EU. If a remainer negotiates, the EU will offer a poor deal as they know she won't leave without one!