You are on page 21. Click the red cross to clear.
“free bus passes, NHS treatment…” - ignorance must be bliss…. 🤪🤦🏻♂️
25th Jan 2026 16:26:15
[104.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
JG - out of interest, would you have the Wrexham owners if hypothetically they wanted AFCW instead of Wrexham a few years back?
25th Jan 2026 16:25:47
[80.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
BTW Galty have you left a legacy in your will to the club for when you pop you clogs, please?
25th Jan 2026 16:25:44
[80.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
MLD - we competed for years in the top flight whilst having the weakest squad on paper. That is because we knew what we were, Now I saw a few weeks back we were talking about playing it out from the back and not playing a Bugiel type.
25th Jan 2026 16:24:49
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Tomato Swig - because that's life. You can't expect a Mercedes for the same price as a Reliant Robin! If the club and the majority of fans have the ambition to see the Club progress then there is a price to pay for it. If you can't afford it - come to less matches or watch Vertu Cup, Women's or Youth matches which are all massively cheaper.
25th Jan 2026 16:21:13
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
The Godfather of Capitalism had this to say about those with the broadest shoulders - "It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion"
25th Jan 2026 16:21:06
[82.lo.gg.ed]
This is seen in football where the wealthiest do contribute the most towards a club's finances. It is the business model of football. The ownership model is immaterial - if we have rich fans chipping in then so be it. In other clubs they do it for various reasons: mitigating tax revenues, they have always supported the club, they buy a club for £100 million and sell it for £200 million but it is sustained by Adam Smith's ideals.
JG: going to matches is not fun. The football is awful, there’s not much hope of wins, not much hope of goals, not even shots on target. Relegation and losing the better players thereafter is definitely a big possibility. In fact losing the better players is a possibility even if we stay up. Im questioning the thought of going nowadays and I know others are. Putting the prices up significantly as you suggest is a complete non goer as I believe will harm attendances significantly. Competing on the pitch should be any teams primary objective. This, imo, can only be done by selling the club and getting in the investment we need to get better quality players. We all know competing in a professional sport is directly related to salaries
25th Jan 2026 16:16:03
[80.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
6MDM - why ignore me? Sorry - I hadn't realised that we can't talk about the clear need to generate more revenue. on this forum. If you think you can find someone with £100m+ who can afford to lose £2.8m each year - then put them forward. I won't be against.
25th Jan 2026 16:14:59
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Mark - what has been clear for years? Are you aware of any testing of ticket price elasticity? I'm not. If the market dictated that we could generate another £2m in ticket revenue by increasing prices - would you be against in principal or because you don't think that we would generate the additional revenue. If the latter - lets do the testing!!!
25th Jan 2026 16:10:59
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
At least JG has stopped saying that an owner wouldn't be allowed to put money in.
25th Jan 2026 16:10:48
[86.lo.gg.ed]
"fewer matches" - yes I know it is a lost cause but I blame people who don't care about our language
Trigger - couldn't agree more. Let the market dictate. Money is not bad and financial success and success on the pitch are directly correlated - unless we get lucky.
25th Jan 2026 16:05:27
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Agree with TF and Spits comments but I find with most irritations if you ignore them they soon go away
25th Jan 2026 16:04:14
[104.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Mark - I'm certainly not holding the club back. I have made my views on ownership by a Community Trust clear on numerous occasions. My point is that whoever owns the Club will want to reach break even in the medium to long term. I suspect that can only be achieved by charging the market rate for tickets not by clinging to some ideological nonsense that others "with the broadest shoulders" should act as benefactors!!
25th Jan 2026 16:02:36
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I've supported the club for 63 years so why should I be priced out of continuing that?
25th Jan 2026 15:58:07
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Also while Galty was watching MK, we were funding and starting the club for him to get the benefit a few seasons later(freeloader)😂
25th Jan 2026 15:54:08
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
NL - my ignore him comment was't aimed at TF, although you probably knew that.
25th Jan 2026 15:50:31
[78.lo.gg.ed]
The traffic driving back from Sheffield today was great. 3 hours door to door. Minimal traffic jams. None on the M25. I was amazed.
Paying years of tax and NI pays for the NHS and Bus pass (hopefully)it's not free. Only someone who was born with a silver spoon would think that way.
25th Jan 2026 15:50:31
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Most of us are just fans not buisness/solution thinkers
ML - ignore him. All he talks about is money. He moans about people not paying enough and him not being prepared to subsidise their hobby while he wants existing fans to be replaced with new rich fans to subsidise his ambition. It's called hypocracy. 90 of the 92 league clubs are privately owned and funded. Owners will stomp up for their own reasons. Why do we think we should be different? We'll either end up in non-league, go into administration or go bust. Our constitution will prevent any meaningful change in ownership. The DTB have already shown they will not amend discounts on ticket prices, even for just premium seats so we're stuck.
25th Jan 2026 15:46:21
[78.lo.gg.ed]
Given what happened to WFC in 2002, when powerless supporters were blamed by the ill informed, for him to surface on here again and do the same to us now is insulting and unwelcome.
Trigger - correct. But it is not going to come from our model in the required £s. It’s so clear and has been for years
25th Jan 2026 15:39:48
[80.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Whichever side of the ownership model you’re on the answer is the same - we need more money. Sadly our leadership seem to be being heavily influenced by those who seek to remove money from the entire football industry and thereby have us somehow come out as winners via that route.
25th Jan 2026 15:33:43
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Talking of songs - the one spurs fans were singing at Burnley apparently made me laugh - “Tottenham go backwards / sideways everywhere they go”
25th Jan 2026 15:33:26
[80.lo.gg.ed]
What was the song being sung on repeat for ages in the 2nd half that had a verse in it referring to a clown? I'm not a singer but do like to know the words. I've not heard it before. Nice that Ryan Johnson now has his own song. If it wasn't for Seddon being a shoe in for POTY he'd have been in with a shout. He was a bit ropey last season but has stepped up this season.
25th Jan 2026 15:31:27
[78.lo.gg.ed]
Not sure why some of our lot were singing Jimmy Savile is one of their own to Rotherham supporters. He didn't come there or have anything to do with them. Think they were getting confused with the Chuckle Brothers.