Spit-Woking and Altrincham are a bit easier than Huddersfield

Not sure where the £50m figure for Bath City comes from but this article talks about a possible £6m deal: [Link]

2 clean sheets for spike and will at sutton united

I had 3-0 or 3-1 defeat today predicted but I did not expect such an abject performance.

*alarm* bells even

Awful performance. What has sasu got on JJ that he keeps picking him ? One shot on target against ten men just pathetic. Thought Stockley did ok when he came on but the arm bels are already ringing.

Luton winner came in 6th minute if added time

Reading who we play next weekend were 3-1 up at half time but lost 4-3 at home to Luton

Sentence even

Like the way that BadEgg put “the club” and “give” in the same sense

Exactly UA - “Dons edged out by Terriers” headline incoming.

Bath City have just secured £50m investment meanwhile the Dons Tryst are busy staying silent while they try and get money for old rope and the money won’t be spent on new rope.

That ‘performance’ today dented the pride that I have in this team. It is indefensible to lose 3-0, the opposition have a player sent off, and have no shots on target- but someone from the club will still try and defend it, which will further highlight the disconnect between the club and the supporters (you know, the supporters who are ALWAYS asked to give more)

Very poor performance with too many players not at the races, when they went down to 10 JJ should have changed Sasu did nothing and we desperately needed Maycock in the midfield was a bit shocked to JJ make 1 of the changes at half time.

Maybe the club should give all of us poor buggers who went to the game today Fulham tickets, the whole team was a shambles, whoever didn’t go today you all dodged a bullet you lucky, lucky bastards.

And how about playing Tilley on the left so he can cross on his natural foot on the outside. Do not get the reasoning behind playing a left winger at right wing-back. Utter madness. He does not score enough to make it worthwhile.

If uddersfeel go on to get promoted, just forget what I said today

… and I totally agree with your last post on playing style

There may not be Silk but if somebody will allegedly pump 50 million into Stockport, a London league club in a relatively prosperous area with permission to expand to 20K is likely to look attractive. As Nick says the other alternative is we lose 1 to 2 million a year till there is no more money.

Our only hope on the pitch is to sign another target man and play direct football. None of this passing nonsense - we will lose possession and get punished. If we are playing it long at least have big, strong forwards to fight for possession and fight for the second balls. And get better at set pieces.

Silk - it’s the theoretical position I’m talking about. For me, every person who refuses to sell (yes I’m talking about over 50%) is holding the club back imo

Silk- forget about being competitive in League 1- we are chronically loss-making and need to “sell out” if we are to survive at all

34 crosses, just 4 successful. If that's our game, we need to have a much higher success rate if we want to score. Stockley put himself about but a lot of really poor performances. Seddon looks like the Seddon we had second time round, Browne was frustrated and poor on the ball, less said about Bishop the better. I thought our subs looked okay. Harrison can pass, some lovely line breaking passes. Sessengon looked good. Some decent crosses. Maycock was quiet but has good movement. Should be starting. Just need more imagination, need better movement, better runs off the ball, way too static.

Tilley worked hard. Stockley put himself about and Sessegnon looked promising. Ogs great as usual. As for the rest........

I am not against us selling out but I do not think there will be any buyers that will make any difference. We are not some club that needs a small investment to fix the problems. We need somewhere in the region of £100 million to be competitive even in League One and I cannot see that coming.