Stuart - if you check my question on Discord, I have raised this very point in DT questions about fundraising.

 OI - the stadium was designed for 20,000 capacity, but we only built 9,300, and then discovered around 8.700 could be sold.

 Timing and certainty are the two advantages Silk. There may not be a buyer out there but then people have bought the likes of Gillingham and Wycombe. We must be at least as attractive as them if the terms are right. It probably will end in administration but I'd like to feel we had tried all the options before reaching that point. The outcome I find harder to see is people investing down to 50%+1 when they can see us heading for administration thus destroying their investment whilst they have zero control over the key decisions.

 Well someone buying us when we are admin could be buying a L2 or NL team rather that a L1 club at present Silk.

 When people say sell the club I repeat who to? Who would be dumb enough to take on our problems when they can pick us up for free if we do go into administration?

 My AI spell check has gone down!

 OI Yes the stadium plans came from a forward looking decision makers at the time but has been mis-mangaged since. Very few fans after buying bonds thought they were going to have to fund the club going forward.

 When it became clear that nobody wanted to take on the role of part time Executive Chairman and candidates even told us the governance model was wrong, we were told there would be an enquiry into how to move on with governance. With Buckley still firmly in place 8 or 9 months later, has anyone heard what progress is being made?

 I don't blame people who a decade ago thought a 10,000 stadium in the borough would enable us to be a successful league club and I can't remeber people telling them they were wrong at the time. The design may have been imperfect but it is still clear that whatever stadium had been built, in the EFL today, you will lose money or go out of the league. We do not have 'owners' willing to support the losses and we have elected people who refuse to engage with the facts.

 TBF,I would of been delighted at the beginning of the season if we were 2 points clear of relegation going into the new year. It's just the way we have become clueless and slow sideway backwards with goals and chances drying up.

 Yes Stuart, what is the problem with our power supplies? Anyone know.

 It’s becoming obviously clear that the members and fans are no longer able or prepared to bail out the club to allow it to reduce its annual losses. Looking at the amount WAWF has got tells you that imo. We are all paying premium prices for everything on a matchday when you look at food, drink and merchandise pricing, so the amount of spare cash people have is reduced along with maybe the desire or feeling that an extra few quid will make any difference long term.

 Ha ha not if we continue with our present coaching regime

 Anyway, if we do go down, at least we will be more competitive in that division…. 👀😬😉

 The Trust Laurence ! They are not making any decisions to stop our yearly losses. If they have no solutions then they need to realise fan ownership has had its day.

 Bromley top of Division 2. Lead by a decent centre forward , Cheek hattrick!

 Keefy, okay, so what sort of decisions should they be making, please?

 Laurence, Day to day staff are not making the important decisions.

 The form tables here show just how bad it has become [Link] Scroll down to the home form section, where the summary says “Woeful, just woeful. AFC Wimbledon's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 3 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0.5 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, AFC Wimbledon is simply not turning up at home games”. I’m not sure whether last night’s result has been included - if not, just an extra “woeful”… 🙄🤷🏻‍♂️

 We are in free fall, expect to be in the National league by 27/28, possibly administration, as we can't fund this expensive ground with near capacity high ticket, vast corporate areas, ground share ,great merch sales, money from sky being in league 1 .etc,etc .

 Keefy - we are a football club run by full timers and majority owned by supporters. Day to day operations have full time staff and have done since 2012.

 Hash- a different angle clearly shows Bugiel push Exeter’s defender into the GK before he heads in.

 May I ask DoughMeister, how are you helping to reduce the budget hole, please? What ideas apart from selling equity might you have, please?

 Fan owned is had it's day. We are a professional fotball club run by part timers. Decisions made by a comittees take too long. 50+1 should have been done and dusted by now. Whether there would have been any takers is a mute point. People running this club are the same as our midfield far too slow in moving the club forward.

 We're also seeing why Lincoln and Stockport were happy to lose Smith and Lewis respectively. The latter have absolutely laughed their way to the bank.