Today Tomorrow Fri 21 Sat 22 Sun 23 Mon 24 Tue 25







Enter e-mail and Tag To Login
Paper's Crowd Count
Last 5 minutes : 11
Last 24 hours : 3087
Refresh Clear Form
   
You are on page 3. Click the red cross to clear.
We have the 3 lounges on the middle floor though? I would think the old offices wouldn’t be possible due to them being right next to the players changing area and access is highly restricted.
19th Nov 2025 11:30:30 
[104.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Curacao displaces Iceland [Link]
19th Nov 2025 11:28:41 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
I only know the name because of a nasty blue liquer popular(?) in the Netherlands
I agree with Laurence about the ground floor. I reckon it would be popular to have a decent lounge or lounges there to go to before and/or after the game, get a seat in the warmth, buy a drink or three and maybe some grub, with the TV matches on in the background. Maybe season ticket/Dons Trust members only?
19th Nov 2025 11:18:32 
[176.lo.gg.ed] 
Wasn't Crystals at Selhurst like that?
6DM - I don’t think its the clubs being greedy, its them having to charge as much as they can to survive.
19th Nov 2025 11:09:37 
[104.lo.gg.ed] 
I actually blame us fans in a way as if a club tried to be more sustainable by keeping ticket prices stable etc and then did shit and got relegated, the fans would be on the owners back asking them to chuck more money in or selling to someone who can.
I have no interest or desire to pay more through turnstiles etc either to remain fan owned either. Fan ownership is a great thing to do when it means you can achieve your immediate goals, but it should be a cross we are prepared to die on.
19th Nov 2025 11:08:20 
[104.lo.gg.ed] 
Also lets be realistic, we have taken outside investment since the days of us accepting a ‘donation’ to pay for Jon Main.
Taking an agnostic view on future fan ownership, the most important priority IMO is to secure the key assets regardless of how the football club is ran and who owns it. We can’t all agree how we get to sustainability or how the club may be funded but we could surely all agree that the stadium is there for the football club and shouldn’t be at the mercy of administrators or malevolent owners. We cannot write any protections into the articles of association, as they are null and void in insolvency (or with a majority ownership change). We need creative ways to protect the key assets. Whilst we are in a position where we are losing ~£3m a year it should be a priority to put appropriate protections in place as administration is pretty foreseeable.
19th Nov 2025 11:07:00 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
"We should be fan owned. And everyone else but me should pay for it"
19th Nov 2025 10:44:51 
[149.lo.gg.ed] 
Kind of the long and short of it, really.
CL - I have been in the "sell-up" camp for a very, very long time.
19th Nov 2025 10:36:18 
[84.lo.gg.ed] 
Just making it clear to those who want to remain "fan-owned" they will need to pay for that and, even then, it won't last long. So, who was it that suggested the "Championship in 5 years aspiration" idiocy?
If we do wanna remain fan owned we do need to pay for it. And I've got no interest in paying for it tbh
19th Nov 2025 10:27:18 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
So, sell up it is.
SB - to paraphrase the old saying, fan ownership begins in our hearts and ends in our wallets.
19th Nov 2025 10:25:42 
[149.lo.gg.ed] 
Not that I think increasing prices will touch the sides in the years to come. And that assumes there isn't negative publicity over it.
Stuart - re your 10.00.14 - precisely. This option MUST be on the table.
19th Nov 2025 10:17:17 
[84.lo.gg.ed] 
REPD - what people think about paying to watch at LO and Mansfield is not pertinent. It is what they think about AFCW and it's survival as a fan-owned club that matters.
Morning all. I think the reaction to £30 for Leyton Orient and Mansfield answers the question about how people will react to higher prices at PL...
19th Nov 2025 10:04:05 
[149.lo.gg.ed] 
Running a football club in 2025 is expensive. Who'd thunk it?
Surely an option that should be on the table is to increase ST and matchday tickets significantly. For arguments sake a £10 increase on matchday tickets and maybe £8 on each match on the ST would cover majority of the losses
19th Nov 2025 10:00:14 
[146.lo.gg.ed] 
If we want to remain fan-owned, we need to start acting seriously and pay for the privilege.
I would like a few options and scenarios when 50.1 is presented again. Personally I would probably vote against 50.1 in principle but open to reviewing any investors they have and judging it like that.
19th Nov 2025 09:58:31 
[146.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
You don't buy shares in a company in danger of going into administration unless there is a clear plan to make sure administration is avoided. Anyone thinking of investing in us is going to want to see what some of us have been asking for over the last couple of years, a clear and achievable strategy not to keep making uncovered losses.
19th Nov 2025 09:24:20 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
and it is snowing on Surbiton hill
Laurence - agree
19th Nov 2025 09:22:29 
[185.lo.gg.ed] 
fans were actually better provided for at KM
Bond repayments is capital, not revenue, so is a balance sheet item and has no impact on profit other than a tiny bit of interest reduction. The JG investment is a post balance sheet item and would be a capital item as well in any event. The lack of transfer income has just highlighted an issue that has been there for a few years.
19th Nov 2025 08:25:10 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
I've posted numerous times what our options are to remain solvent. Not picking one will result in administration or worse. 50% + 1 is nothing more than a short term cash injection that solves very little.
I will be clear, I could afford to pay more on a match day, but that would mean reducing my contribution via sponsorship. Not going down that route for now. However, at KM I had a lounge or two to visit pre-match, which I cannot do at Plough Lane. If the club cannot let out the offices on the ground floor, I suspect it would be far better to create a new lounge open to all with a decent sized bar in addition to the Phoenix.
19th Nov 2025 08:19:07 
[92.lo.gg.ed] 
more effective use of space and cash generative.
Average growth in wage earnings circa 4.6% - so think most of clubs inflation costs should fall onto fans
19th Nov 2025 08:09:51 
[104.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Another thing to consider is that the inflation rate was announced as being 3.6%. This increases the costs of running the club. How much of that additional cost should supporters be fairly expected to bear?
19th Nov 2025 07:50:13 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
I do think that player wages across the board should be addressed first but that will never happen
If we want to stay solvent we either have to get investment or cut costs. I hope the increase in wages is due to promotion clauses in contracts - covered by increased revenue from L1. Do the costs also include the bonds repayments? Does it include the million we got from the John Green sale
19th Nov 2025 07:16:12 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
Will read sometime today the blurb but we have to get those costs under control and if it is playing staff we have to cut that
I wonder what the tipping point is for supporters and how elastic admission prices are? There are some who would go if they charged £50 a game because it is what they do and they know no different. I am just not prepared to pay £30. I'll happily incur costs travelling all over the country and hotel costs for a couple of nights, as well as all the ancillary costs of an away game, but not £30 on the admission itself. Clubs are getting greedy. yes, players are grossly overpaid but whose fault is that. No. Sod that. Screw Orient and screw Mansfield too. The latter is a dump anyway and not even a good away day.
19th Nov 2025 01:02:34 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
I've not been through the detail of the accounts yet but they appear to be prepared to a better standard than prior years. I'm not sure how the club can put out a message saying we'll run out of cash by the end of the season but the accounts are still prepared on a going concern basis. The ticking time bomb will be next years as the bond repayments will be due in less than one year after the balance sheet date, without the means to pay them.
Was the evening with Bayzo filmed? Probably not but the club could make money by filming it and making it available for a small fee. I'd happily pay a fiver or even a tenner.
19th Nov 2025 00:17:25 
[95.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Anybody go to an evening with Bayzo? Hope it was packed & he had a great night. It’s the least deserves for what he’s done for the club
18th Nov 2025 23:19:04 
[49.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Great to have Scotland at the WC and they deserved that. Denmark were very good but the drive from the fans got that team over the line. Two goals in added time is sometimes what it takes for qualification.
18th Nov 2025 22:17:37 
[140.lo.gg.ed] 
Now to read our 2025 accounts 😢