Trigger has kindly edited himself to remove an accusation which may or may not be true and in my judgement opened Bert up to potential consequences. Trigger was unhappy so I invited him to appeal to Bert when I first removed it a few weeks ago, saying that if Bert was relaxed about it, fine it could be up there.

But no-one has an answer for Aideen......

That rings a distant ding-dong, Slough. No wonder we who have other stuff going on in our lives lose track.

The same Dave Boyle who wanted 50+1 back in 2020 with his Purpose Foundation being offered shares in AFCW Plc and they would change the structure to a steward ownership of which the purpose foundation would be in charge off

I think we both were 😁

I thought I was being sardonic, Trig. Was I not then?

So what’s happened?

Same dave who “oversees” the secretary and asst secretary, same Dave who was paid an undisclosed sum of (our) money to rewrite the constitution, claimed that the person who raised an election appeal would “moan about it publicly” if given a substantial fee (currently £10k) in order to bring a constitutional appeal and allegedly posted a tweet which was anti-some-ethic?* That’s a scrutineer?

Probably Dave Boyle, Keefy.

I presume there is an independant scrutineer surely.

Last time the “who is allowed to see the current voting?” question was asked the answer was the unelected volunteer and completely ethically compromised DT Secretary and one of the James’ who I believe now sits on the PLC Board and issued a bizarre statement in the Rule 10 election fiasco.

Royal Mail vs government tom on bbc parliament channel and YouTube see what bollox they come out with from 230 if you want a laugh and lies

Well as the Secretary is allowed to mark their own homework, as in allowing members to vote twice and then be trusted to not count their previous vote, I'd guess they can do whatever they like

Are they allowed to look beforehand ?

Given there were about 30 online and 50 in the room, and the vote needs 3,000 odd votes, I assume the DT already know the result?

Bit i heard was pat on the backs as we are a very well run club😂

Apparently it is all the stadium's fault, so I'm expecting it to resign in the morning. I mean, taking responsibility is important, isn't it?

Ohh I can hear some heavy breathing … what a shit show

They are prepared to lie through their teeth though. At least twice now what with accessing the voting system and then with approving Rule 10.

I presume they have passed, as I would expect, otherwise I don't believe even this board would go through this farce and then tell us that the votes hadn't passed anyway.

Agreed Timmy which is why I haven't voted... so fingers crossed they don't reach the threshold although with people having already voted and then also being allowed to vote tonight anything can be arranged I'm sure

The case for selling out just gets stronger and stronger:/)

When youtube is working, it looks like a pretty standard turnout. As I'm not papers I'd just be guessing at 60 to 80?

Couldn’t tell you Aideen I’m definitely not really here

Are they trying to organise a piss-up?