It’s been clear for a long while that midfield is an area that needs help so hopefully these two signings go some way to resolving that. It’s a bit of a concern that the lad from Luton is an ‘attacking’ midfielder but has hardly scored any goals but a Luton supporting friend of mine is a bit surprised they’ve let him leave as he’s played in 26 matches this season. I wouldn’t mind the addition of one more striker but I doubt if the budget will stretch that far.

Bear with me RK… getting in loanees who can’t get into their own squads in the same division isn’t exactly ambitious. But (1) I do have faith in CC to do the best he can with the budget he’s given and But (2) Nelson in particular comes out of a club rich in resource so competition for places is fair do’s.

Attacking midfielder with 1 goal in 41.😂

'We would like to thank John Green and his friends who kindly contributed to our January transfer window funds, as well as those supporters who gave so generously to the We Are Wimbledon Fund in recent months.'

Zack Nelson

[Link] Sounds promising

Spit probs on a bit of a wind up, but looking at Chuks raises an interesting hypothetical moral question. Yes, he was at scum for 3 years, but left them 7 years ago and is now a free agent. Should we sign him? Main criteria of course, is would he be good enough?

autodefenestration

One thing with Tilley is the ball will go forward on the deck more with him there and only go ariel into the area and not all the time.

Hash several years with them

Chucks Aneke can do one out the bathroom window

Franny?

Welcome Chuks

Wup hasn't recovered since Saturday, very slow loading

Tilley

Darts on itv4 now from Saudi audience dead no booze

Tomswig - The whole ACN tournament was as crazy as it gets, the final being no different. How do you stop players rolling around feigning injury at the slightest touch, or even no contact at all? It's a pity because there was some great football going on most of the time, skills we rarely see in England. I enjoyed the final and felt Senegal were worthy winners in the end, even if the ref was hellbent on giving Morocco every decision (in the first half at least). The better team on the day, won.

Swig - I agree, a clear foul, and rightly penalised. I was actually astounded at the commentary team who were saying there wasn’t a foul there 🤷🏻‍♂️

Football is weird. A week or so ago Martinelli was being berated for rolling the injured Liverpool player off the pitch. Yesterday a Brighton player pulled an 'injured' Bournemouth player back onto the pitch (no idea why) and nobody mentioned it at all.

I agree Swig but it does seem to be a judgement call as in most cases both players are wrestling each other and penalty or free kick is only awarded when one players loses the wrestle. Dunno how stop it tbh. I’d say just let em get on with it and if you don’t wanna get involved then keep moving.

Bit late in the day but Morocco's penalty award was correct. It's a shame more referees don't penalise defenders pulling strikers to the ground when the ball is in flight from corners.

Ps I wasn’t saying you were saying we should gamble… it just seems to be what we’re doing.

This isn’t a post “against” yours. When the league structure is 90 teams privately owned and 2 fan owned and both facing uncertain financial futures then you can blame either side but for want of a better phrase… it is what is is.

OI also depends on what save us looks like. I suspect the most vocal may genuinely believe that selling the majority = championship and beyond. And will never be happy. What the majority want still doesn't seem to be clear.

Doubt many would argue with your moral Lurker. The problem is the people who think changing the structure will happen in time to save us.